<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deepak Goes Deep: &#8220;Obama and the Palin Effect&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalpsychics.com/weblog/2008/09/15/deepak-goes-deep-obama-and-the-palin-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalpsychics.com/weblog/2008/09/15/deepak-goes-deep-obama-and-the-palin-effect/</link>
	<description>Answers from our Psychic Experts</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Prescott</title>
		<link>http://www.globalpsychics.com/weblog/2008/09/15/deepak-goes-deep-obama-and-the-palin-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Prescott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalpsychics.com/weblog/?p=184#comment-925</guid>
		<description>I think Chopra's piece is an example of the all-too-human tendency to caricature and demonize one's political adversaries. Dressing up the analysis in Jungian jargon doesn't make it any more meaningful. 

I find Camille Paglia's take more interesting:

"Conservative though she may be, I felt that Palin represented an explosion of a brand new style of muscular American feminism. At her startling debut on that day, she was combining male and female qualities in ways that I have never seen before. And she was somehow able to seem simultaneously reassuringly traditional and gung-ho futurist. In terms of redefining the persona for female authority and leadership, Palin has made the biggest step forward in feminism since Madonna channeled the dominatrix persona of high-glam Marlene Dietrich and rammed pro-sex, pro-beauty feminism down the throats of the prissy, victim-mongering, philistine feminist establishment."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Chopra&#8217;s piece is an example of the all-too-human tendency to caricature and demonize one&#8217;s political adversaries. Dressing up the analysis in Jungian jargon doesn&#8217;t make it any more meaningful. </p>
<p>I find Camille Paglia&#8217;s take more interesting:</p>
<p>&#8220;Conservative though she may be, I felt that Palin represented an explosion of a brand new style of muscular American feminism. At her startling debut on that day, she was combining male and female qualities in ways that I have never seen before. And she was somehow able to seem simultaneously reassuringly traditional and gung-ho futurist. In terms of redefining the persona for female authority and leadership, Palin has made the biggest step forward in feminism since Madonna channeled the dominatrix persona of high-glam Marlene Dietrich and rammed pro-sex, pro-beauty feminism down the throats of the prissy, victim-mongering, philistine feminist establishment.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
